Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼ºÀå ÀÌÈÄ ±³Á¤Ä¡·á¿Í °ñÀ̽ÄÀ» µ¿¹ÝÇÑ ±¸¼ø±¸°³¿­ ȯÀÚÀÇ °ñ°á¼Õ ºÎÀ§ ÀÓÇöõÆ® Ä¡Çè·Ê

Dental Implant on Alveolar Cleft Site with Orthodontic Treatment and Ramus Bone Graft in Adult Patient: Case Report

´ëÇѱ¸¼ø±¸°³¿­ÇÐȸÁö 2018³â 21±Ç 1È£ p.17 ~ 22
¹ÚÁøÈ£, ±è´Ù¼Ò¹Ì, Á¤ÈÖµ¿, Â÷Á¤¿­,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÁøÈ£ ( Park Jin-Ho ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤°úÇб³½Ç
±è´Ù¼Ò¹Ì ( Kim Da-So-Mi ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤°úÇб³½Ç
Á¤ÈÖµ¿ ( Jung Hwui-Dong ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
Â÷Á¤¿­ ( Cha Jung-Yul ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç

Abstract


We report the case of an unilateral alveolar cleft man who was performed orthodontic treatment and dental implant after autogenous bone graft on cleft site with bone of ramus. We achieved improvement of implant esthetics by multidisciplinary treatment approach in cleft patient. A 35-year-old man with skeletal class I and unilateral alveolar cleft, we planned to graft ramus bone on cleft site, perform orthodontic treatment and to place implant on missing area. For bone graft on the cleft site, we applied autogenous bone of ramus area and demineralized allogenic bone. Orthodontic treatment started for regaining space of dental implant on #22 area, and implant was placed on #22 area. Following the procedure, final prostheses were placed on implant. Upper and lower arch harmony were obtained and space for prostheses were redistributed. Also, we recovered alveolar bone continuity by autogenous bone graft of ramus before orthodontic treatment and could place implant successfully without additional alveloar bone graft on cleft site.

Å°¿öµå

Cleft lip and palate; Implantation; Bone graft

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI